GANITA PRAKASH · GRADE 8 · PART II · CHAPTER 2
BOUND — Locate a number that is not a fraction
Think first. Use AI purposefully. Verify always.
DISCOVER
Start with a sketch and a prediction.
Square 1.414 and 1.415. Which is below 2? Could a longer decimal make an exact fraction?
Try on paper first. Use the model to test your idea before accepting the explanation.
Understand
Squaring positive numbers preserves their order. Successive decimal bounds locate without making a finite decimal exact. Irrationality requires a proof: a non-terminating decimal alone need not be irrational.
Key Ideas
1.414 < < 1.415
Write ≈ 1.414, never = 1.414. Repeating decimals such as are rational.
Visualise
Tighten the bounds by squaring
1. = 1.96 < 2
1. = 2.25 > 2
1.4 < < 1.5
Each interval is narrower. Neither finite endpoint becomes √2.
Follow the prime-factor contradiction
- Suppose = for positive integers m and n.
Step 1 of 5
Method
Compare squares with 2. For irrationality suppose = for positive integers. Then = . Prime 2 occurs an even number of times in but an odd number in , a contradiction.
Worked Example
Given
Positive candidates 1.414 and 1.415.
To Find
Three-decimal lower and upper bounds for
Property
Order of squares of positive numbers.
Solution
- 1. = 1.999396 < 2.
- 1. = 2.002225 > 2.
Result
1.414 < < 1.415.
AIMS Method
- A — Attempt independently
Sketch and predict before using a formula. - I — Investigate the idea
Separate given facts from visual assumptions. - M — Make connections
Connect area, length, algebra and geometric constructions. - S — Scrutinise your reasoning
Check each hypothesis and justify the conclusion.
Think first. Use AI purposefully. Verify always.
Focused Practice
Does a non-terminating decimal alone prove irrationality?
Check & Feedback
Name the known quantities and target, establish the theorem conditions and check your result in the original relationship.
Textbook connection: Ganita Prakash · Grade 8 · Part II · Chapter 2 — The Baudhāyana–Pythagoras Theorem · printed page 39
